The
word 'fantastic' conjures up a positive image for me, as I'm sure it probably
does for you too.
For
example, if somebody told me my cooking was fantastic, I would take that as a
compliment, or assume they were being overly polite - or perhaps sarcastic
given my mixed history with culinary creations (just ask my husband about my 'Greek'
potatoes).
Therefore
to hear countries described as 'fantastically corrupt' is a bit of an oxymoron
- unless of course you admire the fact that somebody's corrupt, which I'm
fairly sure wasn't Mr Cameron's intention.
That's
the problem with snippets of overheard conversations, you don't always get the
full gist of what's going on.
Then,
in another diplomatic kerfuffle following the release of yet another taped
conversation, the Queen has apparently unwittingly insulted the Chinese by
commenting that officials were rude on a State visit.
But,
in all honesty, does it really matter?
If the countries involved in David Cameron's conversation are indeed
corrupt or have a history of corruption, and if the Chinese officials were rude
on their State visit - and walking out on the Ambassador could be considered
the epitome of rudeness (I'd love to know what provoked that response - did he
not proffer enough Ferrero Rocher?), then what's been said is absolutely true.
The
only people that should be upset and embarrassed about it are the people who
are corrupt, and the people who've been rude, not the people who have talked
honestly about it.
OK,
I will concede that it's perhaps a little bit embarrassing to have what you
think is a private conversation made public, but as long as what you're saying
is the truth, then you surely have nothing to fear.
In
fact, I'd love to hear more of what the Queen thinks about the various people
she meets, and the numerous Prime Ministers she's had to deal with. I wonder how many of those she'd describe as
'fantastically annoying'?
No comments:
Post a Comment